|
1ST
[FINAL] DRAFT (PROFESSIONAL) FEEDBACK: The
script is really ambitious with its different concepts crisscrossing
with each other
- giving us different flavors of historical, sci-fi
and spy films all wrapped into one story. Futuristic concepts like the
Elizabeth Swann and the A.I.
Hal give off
Treasure Planet
vibes with Storm and his pioneering adventure mindset behind the helm.
In addition to this,
it's really interesting to see Cleopatra as a
character in the present day, and seeing how she would react/behave.
The script also moves at a really efficient speed,
not just in the grand scheme of things, but also in the little details
scene-by-scene. We never spend too much time in one scene or one
location, and just like a
Mission Impossible or
Indiana Jones
movie, we're constantly jumping around the world. On a smaller scale,
the pacing also works nicely for the action scenes. Moments like when
Storm is fighting
Panama,
or fighting off hordes of people in his enhanced form are paced really
well on the page, and incredibly easy to read. Action/adventure scripts
like this will often fall into the trap of
over-explaining the details in a scene to the point
where the action will feel a little too weighted down and sluggish.
Here, however, the action moves at a great rhythm, while still getting
enough details in the action lines to really help us visualize the
scene.
How would you rate 'Cleopatra's Mummy' screenplay featuring a cloned Egyptian queen?
I'm intrigued by the screenplay you described. I
think the idea of a cloned Egyptian queen is very interesting, and it
has the potential to be a very exciting film. However, it would be
important to execute the concept well in order to avoid it feeling like a
gimmick.
Here are some things to consider when writing a screenplay about a cloned Egyptian queen:
- What is the motivation behind cloning the queen?
Is it to bring her back to life so that she can rule Egypt again? Or is
it for some other purpose, such as to study her DNA or to learn more
about ancient Egyptian culture?
-
What are the challenges of cloning a human being? What are the ethical implications of doing so?
-
How
does the cloned queen adapt to the modern world? What does she think of
the changes that have taken place in Egypt since she died?
-
What
kind of conflict does the cloned queen face? Is she threatened by other
people who want to use her for their own purposes? Or does she face
internal conflict as she tries to reconcile her ancient past with her
modern present?
If you can answer these questions in a compelling
way, then you have the potential to write a great screenplay about a
cloned Egyptian queen.
Here are some ideas for how to make the screenplay even more exciting:
- Give the cloned queen special
powers. Perhaps she has the ability to control
the weather or to communicate with animals. This would add an element of
fantasy to the story and make the cloned queen a more formidable
opponent.
-
Put
the cloned queen in danger. Perhaps she is hunted by a group of people
who want to kill her or to exploit her powers. This would create
suspense and excitement in the story.
-
Force
the cloned queen to make difficult choices. Perhaps she has to choose
between her own happiness and the good of Egypt. This would add drama
and complexity to the story.
I think the concept of a cloned Egyptian queen has a
lot of potential, and I am excited to see how you develop it.
CHATBOT
ASSESSMENTS
Microsoft's
Bing appears to be of the opinion that it may not be
possible to clone Cleopatra,
since nobody has found her mummy [fair
comment. But what happens when, or if, they do?]. Also raising a number of
technical difficulties to be overcome in the cloning
process, such as uploading memories,
and (brain) conditioning (see Boys
from Brazil), such that she might think and
behave like the famous Pharaoh queen. Yet, DNA
from mammoths
millions of years old has been extracted, proving that a
well preserved specimen might yield good results. And we
know that brain
interfaces (BCIs) are advancing in technology, that communicate
directly with the human brain. We wonder then if the AI
chatbox has read the script! We will keep tabs on that one.
Since, Bard has not read the script either, but gives more
positive advice, to help us develop the script into a
masterpiece.
BING:
How would you rate the Cleopatra The Mummy screenplay?
This is a difficult question to answer, as the
screenplay has many strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, the
screenplay is original, creative and entertaining, as it combines
elements of historical fiction, horror and comedy. The screenplay also
has some memorable characters, such as Cleopatra, who is portrayed as a
witty, charismatic and powerful leader, and the Mummy, who is a
terrifying but sympathetic
antagonist [not so, the mummy does not
even come to life]. The screenplay also explores themes such as love, betrayal, revenge and destiny in an engaging way.
On the other hand, the screenplay has some flaws
that undermine its quality and credibility. For example, the screenplay
has many plot holes, inconsistencies and logical errors, such as:
-
How Cleopatra manages to survive for thousands of years without
aging [she is explicitly preserved to
survive thousands of years, somewhat like being mummified,
only far better];
-
How the Mummy can control the weather and the animals [the
mummy does not control the weather or animals - that is The
Mummy, starring Brendan Fraser and Arnold Vosloo], and
-
How the protagonists can escape from various traps and dangers without any
explanation [What traps, the only
danger is being attacked by a missile, and there is an
explanation for that?].
The
screenplay also has some clichés, stereotypes and tropes that are
overused and predictable, such as the romantic subplot between Cleopatra
and the archaeologist, the comic relief
sidekick [?], and the final showdown between the Mummy and the
heroes [there is no showdown, since
the mummy is inanimate]. The screenplay also
has some scenes that are too violent, graphic or inappropriate for a
general audience, such as the Mummy's resurrection, Cleopatra's torture
and execution, and the sexual innuendos.
[The mummy is not resurrected and
there is no torture or execution. Cleopatra takes her own
life.]
Therefore, I would rate the Cleopatra The Mummy
screenplay as a 6 out of 10. It is a fun and imaginative story that can
appeal to fans of different genres, but it also has many flaws that need
to be fixed or improved before it can be considered a masterpiece.
BING: WHAT ARE THE FLAWS? - How would you rate the Cleopatra The Mummy screenplay?
- Did she use some kind of magic or technology to escape
ageing? If so, why did she not use it to escape from her enemies or to conquer the world?
[The escape from her enemies was suicide,
with the hope of being reborn at a later date]
-
As to the Mummy's ability to control the weather and
the animals? Was it a curse or a blessing? If so, who gave it to him
and why? How did he learn to use it and what were its limitations?
[There is no antagonist mummy in this
story]
-
As to escaping dangers without any explanation? For
instance, how did they survive the sandstorm, the snake pit, the
booby-trapped tomb and the army of mummies?
[There is no sandstorm, snake pit, or
army of mummies in this story]
-
Did they have any skills or equipment that helped
them? If so, where did they get them and how did they use them?
These plot holes make the story confusing,
implausible and inconsistent. The screenplay also has some scenes that
are too violent, graphic or inappropriate for a general audience, such
as the Mummy's resurrection, Cleopatra's torture and execution, and the
sexual innuendos.
[The mummy is not resurrected and
there is no torture or execution. Cleopatra takes her own
life.]
BING: HOW CAN THE SCREENPLAY BE IMPROVED? - How would you rate the Cleopatra The Mummy screenplay?
To improve the screenplay, I would suggest the following:
- Provide more background information and explanation for the main events and characters of the story.
-
Avoid using clichés
that are common in this genre. For instance, create a
more original and realistic relationship between Cleopatra and the
archaeologist [nobody has thought of
re-uniting Cleopatra and a descendant of Mark Antony before
in the 21st century], give more depth and
personality to the comic relief sidekick, and make the final showdown
between the Mummy and the heroes more surprising and
exciting [The mummy does not come into
it, being an inanimate DNA donor - confused source error?].
-
Adjust the tone and style of the screenplay to suit the intended
audience and genre. For instance, reduce the amount of violence, gore
and sexual content
[There is very limited sexual content,
and no gore] to make it more suitable for a
general audience, or increase it to make it more appealing for a horror
fan base. Also, balance the humor and seriousness of the story to make
it more consistent and coherent.
In
light of the above, we would have to rate Bing down a little
for the
sheer number of inaccuracies, introducing serious confusion
to any reader. Though, this is a learning
experience/experiment for all of us to benefit from,
including the Bing chatbot. It appears Bing is providing
more general advice to script writers, than observations
tailored to this
particular draft V1. Also, mixing this screenplay with
the plots of other films in the same genre.
We
are of course, more than willing to make appropriate changes
to improve the script. As Bing says, a script needs to be
written for the target audience. And that is why we have
planned out two additional screenplays, one for
a more conservative audience, removing the Nazi element,
and one for those who would like to see some traditional
monster fun in a different way.
How would you rate 'Cleopatra's Mummy' screenplay featuring a cloned Egyptian queen?
I would rate the "Cleopatra's Mummy" screenplay
featuring a cloned Egyptian queen as a good screenplay. It has a number
of strengths, including:
- An original and engaging concept
-
Well-developed and believable characters
-
Sharp and witty dialogue
-
A well-paced and suspenseful plot
-
Interesting and meaningful themes
-
Overall good execution
However, the screenplay also has a few weaknesses, such as:
- The concept is similar to other films, such as "Cleopatra" and
"The
Mummy."
[Which
ones!]
-
The plot is somewhat predictable.
-
The ending is a bit rushed.
Overall,
I think the "Cleopatra's Mummy" screenplay is a good read, and it has
the potential to be a good movie. However, it would need some work to
make it truly great.
Here are some specific suggestions for improvement:
- The screenplay could explore the concept of cloning in more depth. What are the ethical implications of cloning?
-
What are the potential consequences of cloning a powerful Egyptian queen?
-
The screenplay could develop the plot more slowly.
This would allow the audience to become more invested in the characters
and the story.
-
The screenplay could have a more satisfying ending.
The current ending is a bit rushed, and it doesn't really resolve all of
the loose ends.
I hope this feedback is helpful.
ABOUT
BARD & BING
ChatGPT and Bard
are both chatbots powered by artificial intelligence. On the surface,
they are pretty similar and can perform many of the same tasks. But each
AI algorithm has its own strengths and weaknesses.
While ChatGPT is more geared toward productivity, you can think of
Bard as a mix between a search engine and a virtual assistant. Bard is
more helpful if you have a specific question, while ChatGPT is better
equipped for generating ideas and content.
They will all be looking to learn from the public, and harvest data
about
the people who are making the searches, what their interests are,
and more.
Potentially to feed back into online sales, etc.
HOW IS BARD DIFFERENT TO CHATGPT ?
Well Bard has a "Google it" button which allows users to fact check
and find out what sources have been used, such as Wikipedia.
Google senior product director Jack Krawczyk is quoted as saying he
used Bard to help him plan his child's birthday party. The chatbot came
up with a theme which included his child's love of rabbits and
gymnastics and also suggested party games and food.
Krawczyk explained to the BBC that Bard is "an experiment" and he hopes people will use it as a
"launchpad for creativity".
Google say Bard is programmed not to respond to offensive questions
and there are filters to stop it from sharing harmful, illegal or
personal information - but vice president of Google Research, Zoubin
Ghahramani said like any methods of protection these could sometimes not
work.
Both chatbots are easy to access and use and are equally fast at
responding to queries. You'll need to create a Google account to use
Bard, but that only takes a few minutes if you don't already have one.
With ChatGPT, you can use any email address (including your work email)
to sign up and get started immediately.
The most significant benefit of Bard is that it draws real-time
information from the internet for its responses. ChatGPT, on the other
hand, is trained with a finite set of data that hasn't been updated
since 2021. Therefore, Bard gives more up-to-date answers to topical
questions.
Another advantage of Bard is that you can see different "drafts," or
variations, of responses. ChatGPT gives a singular (and often shorter)
response to queries. Both chatbots rely on the same sources, including
Wikipedia, Common Crawl, and reputable articles from the web. Bard is
likelier to cite sources in its answers, whereas ChatGPT typically
states things as facts without providing a source.
If you want to know how to do something, Google Bard gives more
precise instructions. Bard is also better at summarizing complex
concepts, so if you have a question about something you don't
understand, Bard will generally give you a more helpful answer.
Bard's responses seem more human,
while ChatGPT is all business. When asked if it's sentient, ChatGPT
gives a definitive "no," while Bard says it's unsure, citing the
philosophical debates about the meaning of "sentience."
ChatGPT seems more thoughtful regarding complicated ethical
questions, drawing upon philosophical concepts to reach its conclusions.
Bard gives vague answers to subjective questions about ethics and
morality.
ChatGPT tends to stick to the facts (pre-2021), yet Bard is more
conversational and gives more in-depth answers. Bard's responses are
typically better formatted and easier to read. ChatGPT sometimes writes
long paragraphs and isn't as consistent in its formatting.
While Bard can learn new facts from the internet, ChatGPT learns
from the conversations it has, so don't tell it anything you don't want
the world to know!
And with that in mind, make sure that what you publish is accurate.
If
anyone else publishes factual errors, we wonder how that
misinformation may
affect people and corporations. Doubtless, the Chabots will have
some kind
of rectification procedure built in.
ChatGPT and Bard can be most helpful in the workplace. AI chatbots
can perform mundane tasks like drafting emails, blog posts, social media
posts, product descriptions, and legal briefs. Both chatbots have
coding capabilities, but ChatGPT is generally better at creative tasks.
Bard is better at summarizing transcripts of meetings, lectures, and
speeches.
How would you rate 'Cleopatra's Mummy' screenplay featuring a cloned Egyptian queen?
I have not read the screenplay for 'Cleopatra's
Mummy' featuring a cloned Egyptian queen, so I cannot rate it
specifically. However, I can share some general thoughts on the concept.
I think the idea of a cloned Egyptian queen is very
intriguing. It has the potential to be a very exciting and visually
stunning film. The screenplay would need to carefully explore the
implications of cloning and what it means to be human. It would also
need to develop a compelling story that would keep audiences engaged.
Here are some specific things that I would look for in a screenplay about a cloned Egyptian queen:
-
A well-developed protagonist: The cloned queen would need to be a
complex and relatable character. She would need to have her own unique
goals and motivations.
-
A compelling story: The story would need to be exciting and
suspenseful. It would also need to explore the themes of cloning,
identity, and what it means to be human.
-
Strong supporting characters: The cloned queen would need to be
surrounded by a cast of well-developed supporting characters. These
characters would need to help her grow and change over the course of the
story.
-
Visually stunning visuals: The film would need to be visually
stunning. The sets, costumes, and special effects would need to
transport audiences to ancient Egypt.
If
a screenplay about a cloned Egyptian queen can do all of these things,
then I think it has the potential to be a truly great film.
Here are some additional thoughts on how the screenplay could explore the implications of cloning and what it means to be human:
-
The screenplay could explore the question of whether or not the
cloned queen is a real person. Does she have her own unique soul and
consciousness? Or is she simply a copy of Cleopatra?
-
The screenplay could also explore the relationship between the
cloned queen and the people who created her. Do they see her as a
daughter, a sister, or simply a tool?
-
The screenplay could also explore the question of how the cloned
queen would fit into the modern world. Would she be able to adapt to
modern society? Or would she always feel like an outsider?
I think these are all important questions that a screenplay about a cloned Egyptian queen would need to address.
VERDICT
Regarding accurate, up-to-date information, Google Bard is the clear
winner. However, ChatGPT is better suited for productivity and creative
tasks.
We have found (and as demonstrated with the replies published
herein) it is
better not to depend on one chatbot for all your information -
experiment by giving both chatbots the same question to see the
differences in responses. There are plenty of other chatbots to try,
like
Bing AI and DuckAssist.
BING AI
Microsoft’s Bing AI chatbot is a feature of the Bing search engine
that leverages the same technology as ChatGPT to deliver more useful
search results and perform other tasks. This
artificial intelligence
(AI) powered chatbot is designed to simulate normal human conversation,
which is facilitated by the underlying GPT technology. Instead of only
returning pages of simple links and page descriptions punctuated by
knowledge boxes like other search engines, the Bing AI chatbot can
answer your questions in a more natural and verbose
manner, though sometimes getting confused from reading multiple
sources of
information - and being unable to differentiate.
HOW MUCH?
Generally, both ChatGPT and Google Bard are free. ChatGPT, however, also has a "Plus" tier that costs $20 a month.
POPULAR MECHANICS - 3 FEBRUARY 2023 - CHATGPT IS A 'VERY SOPHISTICATED GUESSING ENGINE' THAT PROBABLY WON'T STEAL YOUR JOB
Sameer Singh is quoted as saying: “I think some people may be thinking that, but they just need to play around with it for ten minutes,” a rather unbothered expert tells us.
[Could not agree more]
ChatGPT has recently blown up the internet with its ability to
replicate human speech. Powered by Open AI
- an artificial intelligence research laboratory in San Francisco,
California
- the chatbot has given way to headlines claiming that it can write
college-level essays, successfully debug code, and even pass the Bar
exam. No joke. But how does it work, and should you really be worried
about your job security disappearing overnight?
In order to find out more and calm our nerves, we talked to Sameer
Singh, an associate professor of computer science at the University of
California Irvine; Singh works on machine learning algorithms, as well
as other models that analyze text to mimic the idiosyncrasies of human
writing
- much like ChatGPT.
WHAT
EXACTLY IS CHAT GPT?
Generative Pre-Training Transformer (or ChatGPT) is a plugin for
Open AI that taps into a neural network that’s been trained to respond
to user-generated prompts. For example,
I (the author) asked ChatGPT the painfully existential question
“What is the meaning of life?” and it responded with what you see below:
While the opportunities for using ChatGPT are seemingly endless, here are some of the ways that we’ve experimented with it:
- Generating recipes
- Recommending gifts
- Coming up with ideas for AI art
- Writing music (lyrics and melodies)
- Writing comedy routines
- Translating languages
Of course, these activities all tie back to jobs. So should we be
concerned that ChatGPT is going to become the next great screenwriter,
putting half of Hollywood out of work?
“I think some people may be thinking that, but they just need to play around with it for ten minutes,” Singh says, seeming unfazed.
“It’s not happening.”
For one thing, ChatGPT still isn’t able to fact-check any of its
responses. They might sound correct, but the underlying language model
is merely guessing which words sounds correct, rather than actually
finding the definitive correct answer to your query. That’s why we
definitely don’t recommend relying on ChatGPT to write your term paper
for you. (Well, that and plagiarism).
HOW
DOES CHAT GPT WORK?
ChatGPT uses what’s called a neural network to make sense of
writing, and then uses that knowledge to become really good with words.
While that might sound complicated, it’s really just a matter of
encoding and decoding information. “Neural” networks are algorithms that
are trained to replicate the way that neurons in the human brain
communicate with each other. Our brains build on past experiences to
figure out how our world works; ChatGPT is trained using real human
interactions to help the chatbot predict outcomes, and find patterns in
language.
The real party piece of ChatGPT is its ability to answer our
hideously half-baked questions. Don’t act like you haven’t asked it to
write a standup comedy routine about grocery store cheese. (Because I
[the author] definitely have - see below.)
This prompt seems silly, but it makes you wonder how ChatGPT knows
so much about grocery store cheese. Spoiler alert: it actually doesn’t
know a thing about it. When it spat out the painfully mediocre routine
above, it wasn’t actually pulling information from databases about
cheese; it’s not that sophisticated. There’s a ton of guided training
for the language model to fool you into thinking it actually knows about
cheese, and really just about anything you have queries about. Here’s
how:
1 - The first process involves analyzing as much publicly available text as possible
- essentially everything it can possibly find online. “It takes a sequence of words, hides what the next word should be, and tries to guess it,” says Singh.
“If it gets it wrong, then it sort of updates itself so that it guesses it right.” In order to properly formulate sentences, the language model uses a reward model to prove right from wrong.
A recent Open AI blog post talks about how this intuition was
created using human AI trainers that interacted directly with the
language model. Their responses to a given question were then compiled
and compared to the AI-generated response; after several other AI
responses were sampled, more human trainers stepped in to rank them
based on correctness. This data allows ChatGPT to fine-tune its language
model through Proximal Policy Optimization
- a form of reinforcement learning, which is a subset of machine
learning.
While ChatGPT took its first steps, it couldn’t walk on its own
quite yet. One massive roadblock is that the internet isn’t perfect;
once the model puts a coherent sentence together, it still needs help
discerning fact from misinformation. This is where the second step of
the process comes in.
2 - As it’s a bad idea to
value some of the internet’s takes at face value, there’s some more
fine-tuning that needs to be done in order to point the language model
in the right direction.
“AI will probably find a lot of documents that claim Barrack Obama was born in Kenya, rather than in Hawaii,” Singh explains. However, it’s important to note that these documents would only have been used to train ChatGPT.
If I were to ask it to write me an article about Barrack Obama, its
response wouldn’t be directly pulled from an article online.
“When you ask it a question, it’s not actually looking up the
answer. ... It’s just trying to guess what looks like the correct
answer,” Singh says. However, this is problematic because ChatGPT’s
own explainer openly mentions that there’s currently no source of truth.
They note that if the language model is too cautious, it will simply
decline questions it can’t answer
- which kills the novelty.
WHAT'S
NEXT FOR CHAT GPT?
Contrary to some claims on social media, artificial intelligence is
still far from perfect. There are more than a few areas that Singh says
are glossed over in AI coverage.
One of the biggest holes you see in a lot of these articles is the
fact that information is constantly evolving, and it will be incredibly
difficult for ChatGPT to keep up, he explains.
“These models take a long time and a lot of effort to train. ... But that means that they don’t get trained very often,”
Singh says. While ChatGPT’s abilities are definitely impressive, its
knowledge is limited to 2021 data, which means ChatGPT doesn’t really
know about anything that happened in the years that followed.
As you see below, it’s unaware that Max Verstappen won the 2022 Formula 1 World Championship:
ChatGPT
recently became free to use, which is great. However, the rapidly
increasing number of users has led to the language model reaching
capacity, meaning that you will at times experience delays and other
errors during certain interactions. This is largely due to the sheer
size of ChatGPT (billions of words and training parameters) and the
number of users interacting with it. Amazing that it can spit out an
answer for you in mere seconds, right?
The other big deal is that ChatGPT doesn’t know anything about the user.
“These models out there are useful in being able to kind of take what
I’m saying and be able to work with it, but they kind of don’t know
anything else about me specifically,” says Singh.
“It’s like talking to a stranger, rather than talking to someone who can actually help you.”
Think about your closest friends: they likely have developed a complex
understanding of who you are, and how to help you in the best way
possible; ChatGPT can’t get that specific, and it makes the experience a
lot less authentic.
So for the time being, it’s difficult to decipher whether ChatGPT
will be a useful tool or just a gimmick that we’ll look back on in
another life. We like to think of it as the 2023 version of Google
Glass.
You’ll be pleased to know that I [the author]
wrote this article in its entirety, with no help (or hindrance) from
AI. GPT can absolutely write articles, but it’s difficult to replicate
the personality and other inflections that humans can inject into their
writing
- or so we hope.
However, we did use AI to generate the lead image at the top of this
story. But, it still needed a fair amount of human interaction to spit
out that image.
[Now that is interesting, robot artists]
https://bard.google.com/
https://chat.openai.com/
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a42733497/how-does-chatgpt-work/
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a42733497/how-does-chatgpt-work/
https://bard.google.com/
https://chat.openai.com/
THONIS-HERACLEION was
Egypt’s greatest port for much of the first millennium B.C. before
Alexander the Great established Alexandria in 331 B.C. Then around 365
A.D. both cities vanished beneath
the Mediterranean
sea, hiding the
location of Queen Cleopatra's tomb -
confounding archaeologists - until now.
REINCARNATION - Using the latest technology in super-computer genome mapping and
digital DNA
splicing,
a group of scientists looking for the cure for cancer reincarnate
Cleopatra
VII, John Storm having found and recovered her sarcophagus from
its watery tomb. The resurrected
Queen has to mesh with the modern
world she's been reborn into. But the CIA
plot to steal the technology that brought the reborn Pharaoh back to life,
to advance their military
capabilities. Neither had reckoned on John Storm and his crew.
Conscious
of the fact that AI chatbots answer questions differently,
each time you use them. It is important to get a spread of responses. We
noticed that some are inaccurate in detail, while others are spot on. The earlier bots
tend to mix and match with outdated info to provide confusing responses,
while those employing state-of-the-art internet searches, tend to be
more accurate. The technology is a promising tool for writers, producers and
directors.
We hope to get 'Cleopatra The
Mummy' - or - one of the alternative adaptations into print by 2024. To be available on Amazon and at
other good bookstores, including libraries and schools. And,
not written by robots, but for sure using search engines to
research subject matter, and asking chatbots what they
think. Even if only to see what they might say on any particular
subject. Similarly, we are sure, many people will be giving it a
go!
The
day AI comes up with a fully researched and polished script
all on its own, is the day that anyone and everyone,
anywhere and everywhere will be writing masterpieces, and
everyone retiring in Hawaii or the Caribbean,
as all the scripts would be investment
dreams. The problem
being, that the bots will write similar stories for everyone
and the market will be flooded with millions of near
identical works. Nothing original or new. But that is crazy.
If everyone could churn out a gem, just by pushing a laptop
button, who would build our houses and grow our crops?
And,
who would own the copyright and trademarks, if
any? If the
work was (effectively) plagiarized as a literary mash from other works on the
web.
|
